vaccine

W.H.O. Will Mandate Global Pandemic Response & Punish misinformation

W.H.O. Will Mandate Global Pandemic Response & Punish misinformation

Eric Brazau

The International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response or Pandemic Treaty is a proposed international agreement to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. The 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member states agreed in December 2021 to begin negotiations on a global pandemic treaty, aiming for a draft agreement to be finalized by May 2024 for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly.

World Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response

Tedros

April 2020 W.H.O. leader Tedros DOWNLOAD TREATY

People in countries with stay-at-home orders are understandably frustrated with being confined. But the world will not and cannot go back. There must be a new normal, a world that’s healthier, safer and better prepared.

The following are excerpts taken from the proposed unfinalized draft.

W.H.O.  Secretariat to play the leading, convening and coordinating role in operational aspects of an emergency response to a pandemic.

Under this treaty W.H.O. members must enforce orders from the W.H.O. and if they don’t they will be sanctioned.

The treaty demands that national and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization, that undermine public health.

W.H.O. Secretariat to build capacity to deploy proactive countermeasures against misinformation and social media attacks.

Develop standards for producing a digital version of the international certificate of vaccine nation and prophylaxis and W.H.O. will be in charge of the digitalization of all health forms.

W.H.O. will also share real time information about travel measures.

W.H.O. will assume control over manufacturing Vaccines

A truly global end-to-end platform for vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics, and essential supplies, shifting from a model where innovation is left to the market to a model aimed at the delivering global public goods.

Medical staff wearing protective gears walk in a residential area to screen residents

None of this is going to be optional because an amendment to the treaty from the Biden administration contains a provision for a compliance committee. it provides that every member country in the W.H.O. must:

Inform the W.H.O. about the establishment of its National competent authority responsible for the overall implementation of the protocols that will be recognized and held accountable.

Will the treaty be legally binding?

Recent academic commentary by Clare Wenham, Mark Eccleston-Turner and Maike Voss suggested that the WHA’s mandate for the INB (In December 2021, at its second-ever special session, the World Health Assembly established an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB), leaves room for an outcome that is not legally binding. They suggest:

The language of ‘a legally binding instrument to be adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution’ was changed to ‘WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument … with a view to adoption under Article 19, or under other provisions of the WHO Constitution as may be deemed appropriate by the INB’ (emphasis added), meaning that the resulting ‘pandemic treaty’ may not actually be a treaty at all, but some other instrument, lacking the legally binding force of a treaty.29 However, the initial proponents of the initiative, including the UK, E and others, have supported a legally binding treaty at this stage, with the EU suggesting that an “international instrument” would also be binding in international law.

The substantive suggestions called for, as summarized by these experts, include:

Anchoring the treaty in human rights and addressing the principles of the right to health, equity, solidarity, transparency, trust, and accountability;

• Using a One Health approach for pandemic prevention and early detection;

• Stronger health systems information and reporting mechanisms; including a better use of digital technology for data collection and sharing;

• A reform of the WHO alarm mechanism, the public health emergency of international control (PHEIC) declaration process and travel and travel restrictions;

• Pathogen and genomic data sharing;

• Resilience to and response to pandemics, including universal access to medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, medical equipment and treatments as well as resilient supply chains, technology transfer;

• Investments in health system, strengthening and increased financing for pandemic preparedness and response;

• Stronger international health framework with a strengthened WHO at the centre and increased global coordination;

• Reinforcing legal obligations and norms of global health security and standard settings of health care systems;

• Coordination of research and development (R&D).21 Proposals from stakeholders on what should be included in the treaty were heard by the INB at public hearings in April 2022 and can be accessed on the INB’s website.

Disagreement & pushback Against the W.H.O. Plan

Dr Scott Atlas was interviewed on May 2019

Question:

Stanford graduate

This seems like an enormous amount of power flowing out of our country to an international unelected body?

Dr Scott Atlas M.D. is the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow in health care policy at the Hoover Institution. Fact check rating

The world health organization as well as other organizations like the world economic forum are trying to set rules that countries must obey, Tedros himself said these rules are obligatory. This is not the role of any international organization. These organizations, including the CDC, are supposed to be advisory. They’re not supposed to set rules and laws. That is a complete reversal of what should happen in a free society – if we still live in one? The World Health Organization has been an egregious failure. I cannot outline all of it, but it began at the beginning of this pandemic when they were grossly wrong by orders of magnitude about the basic data on infections and fatality rates. They politicized and were completely impotent in doing the one thing they should. And that

was getting transparency and information from China at the beginning when when it counted. They disregarded all the evidence that is known in biology about symptomatic spread being not that important, about masks etc. They attempted to redefine basic biology by changing the definition of herd immunity. They tried to get rid of immunity from recovery from infection and somehow make it seem like there was only immunity from a vaccine. It was purely agenda driven pseudoscience, what they would call “misinformation”… Centralized power organizations, including our own government, were reckless. They were unethical in doing the lockdowns. Why was it unethical? They actually imposed a policy that was more harmful to the very vulnerable people that they purported to care about, children, the poor people. They were harmed. But the affluent were spared by their policies. And they did all this, usurping all the known laws and constitutional rights and freedoms that people in free societies have… Cannot have these increasing powerful organizations grabbing more power over free citizens. We need the agencies just for information. And it’s got to be transparent. We have to have oversight of their information. And they should have absolutely zero obligatory authority over any individual and over any Nation

Conclusion: This treaty brings nations further into the grip of a One World Government. Of course nations will always be permitted to keep their flags and national anthems because with out them it would be difficult to hold the Olympics. The Olympics generates big revenues for many important people as does World Soccer, FIFA.

WHO Created INB

The second less obvious major implication of this treaty is the inclusions of “Anchoring the treaty in human rights and addressing the principles of the right to health, equity…” What exactly does this mean? Better question is – What could it mean? Could it mean that some man in man in Africa needs a heart and lung transplant but his “nation” cannot provide it for him, therefore, it becomes the mandated responsibility of the signatories of the treaty to provide it for him. Your countries health care has become the health care system to the world paid for by the citizens of that ‘nation”

Canada is committed to ditching a policy that rejects immigrants because they’re sick or disabled and could be a drag on the health system, Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen says in November 2017:

“From a principled perspective, the current excessive demand provision policy simply does not align with our country’s values of inclusion of person with disabilities in Canadian society,” he said during an appearance at the House of Commons immigration committee Wednesday.

Hussen didn’t say how the provision would be changed, but said repealing it entirely is one option on the table. CBC full article.

Vaccine Statistics
True cost of immigration,
Chain Migration

Facts About Dr. Tedros Adhanom, Director-General Of World Health Organization
Experts: 93% Of Deaths Directly Linked Back To The Vaccination

Experts: 93% Of Deaths Directly Linked Back To The Vaccination

Renu
PDF Complete Study scroll Down

Covid Vaccine adverse effects. The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.

I got an email recently from Mike Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, who urged me to check out this He wrote me this email on 12/24/21:

Steve,

This is about the worst 15min I’ve ever seen.

Mass covid19 vaccination is leading to mass murder.

Mike 

The video references this paper, posted on December 10, 2021, On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination by Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD. It has been getting a lot of attention lately.

The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine. These were all cases where the coroner ruled as NOT being caused by the vaccine.

They discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all 14 cases.

A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:

Cardiovascular strong assoiation hemorrhagic stroke
  1. inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
  2. the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
  3. a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.

Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.

Here’s the video presentation of the results

VAERS as well as other independent studies LINK (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events we elevated.

Reactions from a level-headed scientist (name withheld to protect him from attack)

If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions.  The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot.  Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations.  So, in the USA, where ~200M people have been fully inoculated, the number of deaths will not be the 10,000 or so reported in VAERS, or the 150,000+ scaled-up deaths from VAERS, but could be closer to tens of millions when the inoculation effects play out!

pink & white adverse reactions covid link with vaccines & death

What the above three findings (Burkhart, Hoffe, Cole, and I suspect many others who have not yet come forward) show is that the post-inoculation effects are not rare events (as reported by the media-gov’t), but are in actuality frequent events.  They may be, in fact, universal, with the severity and damage different for each recipient. 

This work independently validates the LINK analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine.

The question in my mind is whether it is possible to reverse these inoculation-based adverse events.  Can the innate immune system be fully restored?  Can the micro clotting be reversed?  Can the autoimmunity be reversed?  I have seen a wide spectrum of opinions on whether this is possible, none of which is overly convincing. 

Are we headed for the situation where the ~30% unvaxxed will be devoting their lives to operating whatever is left of the economic infrastructure and serving as caretakers for the vaxxed?

I realize the above sounds extreme, and maybe when more data are gathered from myriad credible sources the results and conclusions may change, but right now the above data seem to synchronize with the demonstrated underlying mechanisms of damage.  Additionally, we seem to be doubling down on inoculations, with fourth booster being proposed for Israel, and UK suggesting quarterly boosters.

Dr. Ryan Cole’s reaction

Background of two of the scientists behind the study

Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.

Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsequently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

Subscribe to Steve Kirsch’s newsletter

By Steve Kirsch  ·  Thousands of subscribers

Aborted Fetal DNA in Vaccines Could Explain Rise in Autism

Aborted Fetal DNA in Vaccines Could Explain Rise in Autism

Eric Brazau

Dr. Pamela Acker, one of the most knowledgeable people in the world on vaccines and on what goes into them. Dr. Acker was interviewed discussing Covid on John-Henry Westen Show, which Premiered Jan 12, 2021. The Origins of the Foundational Building Blocks for Vaccines.

With the Maderna and Pfizer vaccines, there is not any aborted fetal material remaining in the vaccine because they’re not actually cultured or produced directly in the aborted fetal cells. But with the AstraZenica vaccine and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine for Covid, as well as the rubella vaccine and the chickenpox vaccine, there are remainders of these aborted fetal cells that end up in the vaccines themselves. When you get these vaccines, you are actually injecting pieces of this individual who is murdered into your body. Those pieces tend to be remnants of DNA and some protein debris. But the DNA is particularly of concern because Dr Theresa Deisher of Sound Choice Pharmaceuticals, which came into existence in the early 2000s, was also working on solving this problem with ethical vaccines – the availability of ethical vaccines. She has some tremendous work. She’s summarized where she has looked at the relationship between the increase in use of aborted fetal cell derived vaccines that corresponds to an increase in autism rates in the countries that she’s looked at. And this has been in some countries in Europe, as well as the United States. She’s seen that there’s a dose dependent response. So the more aborted fetal cell vaccines that we use, the higher the incidence of autism, or the greater the increase there is in the autism. So she said ‘well let’s take a look at that. Let’s see if there’s any sort of biologically plausible mechanism for that.’  She made the connection that, when you put these aborted fetal DNA contaminants into a living human being, something can occur. This occurs in vitro and cell culture in the laboratory; it is called homologous recombination. The DNA that’s being injected into the individual can line up with the DNA that corresponds to individual cells. Then there are some enzymes that can come along and they can swap those two pieces. So you end up losing your actual DNA and having the DNA from the aborted fetal cells incorporated into your cells. She was saying how this could potentially explain why some individuals [develop] autism, although not all because autism is a very multifaceted problem. There’s no one strict straight answer for why it develops in some individuals and not in others. But in some individuals, you see hundreds of what are called De novo mutations. an alteration in a gene that is present for the first time in one family member as a result of a mutation. These are mutations that came out of nowhere. Their parents didn’t have them. You shouldn’t see hundreds of mutations in a child and just from one generation. That child is very young, probably still, they can’t accumulate all these mutations. Well, they can if this mutated DNA [is present]  because, if you recall from the beginning of the talk, we talked about how, in order for cell lines to be immortalized, we’re sticking viral oncogenes [into the cells], these cancer-promoting genes, these mutations, into them in order to keep them growing in cell culture indefinitely. The DNA in these cells is definitely mutated. This could be the source of the mutations that we’re seeing in some of these kids that are developing autism. This is one possible mechanism for why we’re seeing that. It’s not outside the realm of possibility biologically, but also it makes sense if you think about it just from natural law. If you’re going to do something as heinous as inject into yourself the remains of somebody who is murdered, there’s going to be a natural consequence to that. You can’t just do that and not have any negative effects.

Vaccines fuel Live Abortion Fetus Cell Harvesting Industry

Vaccines fuel Live Abortion Fetus Cell Harvesting Industry

Eric Brazau

Dr. Pamela Acker, one of the most knowledgeable people in the world on vaccines and on what goes into them. Dr. Acker was interviewed on John-Henry Westen Show, which Premiered Jan 12, 2021. The Origins of the Foundational Building Blocks for Vaccines. Bellow in an excerpt.

After the Wakefield scare that potentially implied that the MMR [measles, mumps, rubella vaccine] was connected with the development of autism. And so some just stopped producing the separate vaccines. You can only get it now as the trivalent vaccine with measles mumps and rubella. Which means that you can’t ethically be vaccinated for any of those things because the vaccine is produced in aborted fetal cells. It’s produced in the wi-38 cell line. And that cell line took, I believe it was, 32 abortions before they got to that cell line. The number 38 again is the number of experiments that were actually performed. I believe it was 32 individual babies… They dissected 27 fetuses before they had the virus that is currently in use in the rubella vaccine. And they continued with 40 more elective abortions isolating a number of different viral strains that didn’t ultimately get used in the vaccine. But if you put all that together, you end up with approximately 99 abortions just for the rubella vaccine. And, you know, keeping in mind that all of them are probably done under the same horrific conditions that we’ve just described. “deliver these babies via cesarean section. The babies are in some cases still alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue, to the point where their heart is still beating. And they’re generally not given any anesthetic because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract. So they’re removing this tissue while the babies are alive.” And in some cases, where babies were delivered, the entire amniotic sack was removed from the mother. And these babies were either dissected right then and there. In some cases, they were stuck in the refrigerator to sort of preserve them slightly so that they could be dissected a little bit later… Yet, your average Catholic parent who goes into the doctor’s office and is asked, ‘do you want the MMR’ doesn’t even know that this is how this was developed. So when Bishop Schneider was talking in the interview of the moral complicities that are being asked on this grand scale of people to just accept, this isn’t something that’s brand new with the advent of Covid. There have already been significant inroads made in terms of getting people to appropriate evil. To use something that has a truly evil origin in it for their benefit even though they’re not really cooperating in bringing the evil about per se. That doesn’t even get to the fact that continuing to do this then fuels the market for additional cell lines and additional aborted fetal products and additional vaccines that are made in aborted fetal cells. Because, if we had been refusing the MMR vaccine, we wouldn’t have Covid vaccines that are made with aborted fetal cells.

  • LiveNew.org

Complete Video

Vaccine Manufacture Extract Cells from Living Fetus

Vaccine Manufacture Extract Cells from Living Fetus

Eric Brazau

Extract cells from living fetus Dr. Pamela Acker, one of the most knowledgeable people in the world on vaccines and on what goes into them. Dr. Acker was interviewed on John-Henry Westen Show. It premiered Jan 12, 2021. The Origins of the Foundational Building Blocks for Vaccines. Bellow in an excerpt

human embryo floating in the womb connected to ambilocal cord, Reddish hue
Human embryo floating in the womb connected to ambilocal cord

Pam Acker:

Researchers have gone on record saying that you need to get that tissue within about 5 minutes of the abortion. This is in order for it to be optimally viable. If you wait an hour it’s useless.

In a spontaneous miscarriage the baby dies long before the fetal tissue is removed from the body of the mother. A spontaneous abortion or that miscarriage would not be viable to start a cell line at all. There’d be no way that you could get a living cell line out of dead tissue. So this had to have been a baby that was aborted and they knew that this tissue was going to be used for research. They must get there within that 5 minutes to an hour window. It is preferable within the first 5 minutes in order to get that tissue preserved.

It will be argued that Extracting cells from a living fetus is a form of cannibalisms

baby 3 pounds in a gloved hand. lots of blood and forceps
Moments before extracting cells from fully viable baby

John Weston: Well, so that goes right into the baby parts scandal that we’re dealing with. University researchers tell the mothers we’re looking for a kidney or an arm to experiment with. They ask them to wait longer so it’s further developed and provides a better specimen.

Mother 30 with daughter 8. Both in white frilly dresses. both wear white floppy hats. daughter has hand on mothers pregnant belly
Not aborted fetus

And this is where I issue a warning, If there little ears listening to me. talk – because it’s a more graphic. In many cases they will deliver these babies via cesarean section. The researchers start extracting the tissue while the babies heart is still beating.

And they’re generally not given any anesthetic because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract. They’re removing tissue while the babies are alive and in extreme amounts of pain.

Complete interview

Extract cells from living fetus Rubella Vaccine