Democrats Need War With Russia to Cover their Incompetence

Democrats Need War With Russia to Cover their Incompetence

June 21, 2022. America war Russia Ukraine. “Ukraine was massing troops preparing to invade the Donbass and they Russia.”

Poland and Lithuania are being sucked in. Why? Because they are NOTO members. They will attack Russia. Russia will retaliate. This will automatically trigger NATO to defend member states. BINGO! America can war directly with Russia without using Ukraine as a proxy.

Biden administration needs this war to remain in power. They need this war to distract from their pathetic incompetency. With a nuclear war they could potentially suspend elections.

Watch man in Ukraine explain. CLICK VIDEO

Learn more about the misinformation CLICK HERE

Quran Burning used to Accelerate Islamization of Norway

Quran Burning used to Accelerate Islamization of Norway

In Norway a since 2019 a group called “Stop Islamization of Norway” has been burning the Quran

Norwegian Junior Imam

An Imam has responded with an urgent appeal.

Brothers and sisters the last year a racist anti-Muslimism group have been desecrating and burning the Quran in front of the mosque in Norway. They are doing this to provoke a reaction from the Muslim community. So, that they can label Muslims as a violent terrorists and win support for their anti-Muslimism propaganda. The Norwegian government allows them to continue burning the Quran in front of the house of Allah in the name of freedom of speech.

Angry Imam in Norway

 Even during Ramadan they visited Muslim mosques and burned the Quran with the protection of the Norwegian police. For such a long time we Muslims have been feeling powerless because we can’t do anything when our religion our honor and the book that we hold so close to our heart are being humiliated and disgraced.

But things will now change, God willing, we have found a way to stop the desecration of the Quran. The extremist organization that is burning the Quran is called “Stop the Islamization of Norway”. They have come to our Masjid twice and hung two banners. One stating Islam is barbarism and unwanted in Norway the other banner labeling our Masjid “Oslo Jihad Center” insinuating Muslims are terrorists.

They are burning the Quran and hanging up these banners as a symbol of eradicating Islam in Norway. They are hoping to provoke a reaction from the Muslims so they can justify their hatred and win support for their anti-Muslim propaganda.

We will give them a reaction but not the one that they want to see. We will not do anything that would tarnish the image of Islam and create problems for the Muslims. Rather, every time they burn the Quran symbolizing the extinction of Islam we will react by raising huge amounts of funds to spread Islam and establish the symbols of Islam in Norway.

We have, praise be to Allah, purchased the largest mosque property in the capital of Norway to establish the biggest mosque and dawa’h center in this country. The despicable individual burning the Quran thinks that he can extinguish the light of Allah with his attacks. But we will use him, a useful idiot, to fund the spreading of the message of the Quran in Norway. Every time they burn the Quran we will raise tens of thousands of dollars and we will distribute 100 copies of the Quran to the people of Norway.

Warning Highly Offensive

Praise be to Allah they want to extinguish the light of the Allah with their mouth but Allah refuses and uses them to perfect his light even though disbelievers hate it. Islam will be established in Norway. We will make these anti-Muslims the very reason for Islam to flourish in the country. So brothers and sisters please donate to generously in the path of Allah, defending the honor  our religion and earning Allah’s pleasure and marvelous reward.

Competing Visions of Islam Will Shape Europe in the 21st Century. Quran Burning Sweden Islamophobia.

To learn More

Texas Imam says Fanaticism and Righteousness can be the Same

Texas Imam says Fanaticism and Righteousness can be the Same

April 12, 2014 in Oslo, Norway Yasir Qadhi gave a lecture. the following is an excerpt.

Could be a pious Muslim

Senior scholars were duped by Juhayman. Senior scholars believed Juhayman to be righteous… What does that show you? It shows you that fanaticism exists in people that might otherwise appear to be righteous. Even to our scholars…

Most of the people who joined Juhayman’s movement are hafiz (memorized Quran) of the book of Allah. They were genuinely religious. They thought they were doing something good…. These are righteous people. But they’ve lost site of reality. They are so incensed and enraged at music and singing that they are willing to shed blood in the Kaba… And brothers and sisters, we see the same fanaticism in the modern jihadist movement…

Juhayman man wrote several pamphlets and I went through them for a conference that I was giving.  It’s very scary. I am a man who has a master’s in theology. I know my religion I was reading his documents with a fine tooth comb. I was waiting to jump on something that I could say aha this shows he’s a deviant, aha this shows he’s a fanatic. I swear by Allah, I could barely find anything that gave me warning signals. It seemed to be very solid, very well argued, very passionate. And this terrified me.

Why? I have the advantage of hindsight looking back and I am going through his pamphlets with a fine tooth comb and I don’t find anything wrong. Many of my teachers knew him personally. They all said the same thing that we really thought he was a righteous pious individual. The movement of Juhayman is an interesting movement to study and it came from within the general Salafi tradition. Most of the people with him were from the University of Medina.   

To learn more

W.H.O. Will Mandate Global Pandemic Response & Punish misinformation

W.H.O. Will Mandate Global Pandemic Response & Punish misinformation

The International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response or Pandemic Treaty is a proposed international agreement to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. The 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member states agreed in December 2021 to begin negotiations on a global pandemic treaty, aiming for a draft agreement to be finalized by May 2024 for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly.

World Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response

April 2020 W.H.O. leader Tedros DOWNLOAD TREATY

People in countries with stay-at-home orders are understandably frustrated with being confined. But the world will not and cannot go back. There must be a new normal, a world that’s healthier, safer and better prepared.

The following are excerpts taken from the proposed unfinalized draft.

W.H.O.  Secretariat to play the leading, convening and coordinating role in operational aspects of an emergency response to a pandemic.

Under this treaty W.H.O. members must enforce orders from the W.H.O. and if they don’t they will be sanctioned.

The treaty demands that national and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization, that undermine public health.

W.H.O. Secretariat to build capacity to deploy proactive countermeasures against misinformation and social media attacks.

Develop standards for producing a digital version of the international certificate of vaccine nation and prophylaxis and W.H.O. will be in charge of the digitalization of all health forms.

W.H.O. will also share real time information about travel measures.

W.H.O. will assume control over manufacturing Vaccines

A truly global end-to-end platform for vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics, and essential supplies, shifting from a model where innovation is left to the market to a model aimed at the delivering global public goods.

Medical staff wearing protective gears walk in a residential area to screen residents

None of this is going to be optional because an amendment to the treaty from the Biden administration contains a provision for a compliance committee. it provides that every member country in the W.H.O. must:

Inform the W.H.O. about the establishment of its National competent authority responsible for the overall implementation of the protocols that will be recognized and held accountable.

Will the treaty be legally binding?

Recent academic commentary by Clare Wenham, Mark Eccleston-Turner and Maike Voss suggested that the WHA’s mandate for the INB (In December 2021, at its second-ever special session, the World Health Assembly established an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB), leaves room for an outcome that is not legally binding. They suggest:

The language of ‘a legally binding instrument to be adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution’ was changed to ‘WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument … with a view to adoption under Article 19, or under other provisions of the WHO Constitution as may be deemed appropriate by the INB’ (emphasis added), meaning that the resulting ‘pandemic treaty’ may not actually be a treaty at all, but some other instrument, lacking the legally binding force of a treaty.29 However, the initial proponents of the initiative, including the UK, E and others, have supported a legally binding treaty at this stage, with the EU suggesting that an “international instrument” would also be binding in international law.

The substantive suggestions called for, as summarized by these experts, include:

Anchoring the treaty in human rights and addressing the principles of the right to health, equity, solidarity, transparency, trust, and accountability;

• Using a One Health approach for pandemic prevention and early detection;

• Stronger health systems information and reporting mechanisms; including a better use of digital technology for data collection and sharing;

• A reform of the WHO alarm mechanism, the public health emergency of international control (PHEIC) declaration process and travel and travel restrictions;

• Pathogen and genomic data sharing;

• Resilience to and response to pandemics, including universal access to medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, medical equipment and treatments as well as resilient supply chains, technology transfer;

• Investments in health system, strengthening and increased financing for pandemic preparedness and response;

• Stronger international health framework with a strengthened WHO at the centre and increased global coordination;

• Reinforcing legal obligations and norms of global health security and standard settings of health care systems;

• Coordination of research and development (R&D).21 Proposals from stakeholders on what should be included in the treaty were heard by the INB at public hearings in April 2022 and can be accessed on the INB’s website.

Disagreement & pushback Against the W.H.O. Plan

Dr Scott Atlas was interviewed on May 2019

Question:

Stanford graduate

This seems like an enormous amount of power flowing out of our country to an international unelected body?

Dr Scott Atlas M.D. is the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow in health care policy at the Hoover Institution. Fact check rating

The world health organization as well as other organizations like the world economic forum are trying to set rules that countries must obey, Tedros himself said these rules are obligatory. This is not the role of any international organization. These organizations, including the CDC, are supposed to be advisory. They’re not supposed to set rules and laws. That is a complete reversal of what should happen in a free society – if we still live in one? The World Health Organization has been an egregious failure. I cannot outline all of it, but it began at the beginning of this pandemic when they were grossly wrong by orders of magnitude about the basic data on infections and fatality rates. They politicized and were completely impotent in doing the one thing they should. And that

was getting transparency and information from China at the beginning when when it counted. They disregarded all the evidence that is known in biology about symptomatic spread being not that important, about masks etc. They attempted to redefine basic biology by changing the definition of herd immunity. They tried to get rid of immunity from recovery from infection and somehow make it seem like there was only immunity from a vaccine. It was purely agenda driven pseudoscience, what they would call “misinformation”… Centralized power organizations, including our own government, were reckless. They were unethical in doing the lockdowns. Why was it unethical? They actually imposed a policy that was more harmful to the very vulnerable people that they purported to care about, children, the poor people. They were harmed. But the affluent were spared by their policies. And they did all this, usurping all the known laws and constitutional rights and freedoms that people in free societies have… Cannot have these increasing powerful organizations grabbing more power over free citizens. We need the agencies just for information. And it’s got to be transparent. We have to have oversight of their information. And they should have absolutely zero obligatory authority over any individual and over any Nation

Conclusion: This treaty brings nations further into the grip of a One World Government. Of course nations will always be permitted to keep their flags and national anthems because with out them it would be difficult to hold the Olympics. The Olympics generates big revenues for many important people as does World Soccer, FIFA.

The second less obvious major implication of this treaty is the inclusions of “Anchoring the treaty in human rights and addressing the principles of the right to health, equity…” What exactly does this mean? Better question is – What could it mean? Could it mean that some man in man in Africa needs a heart and lung transplant but his “nation” cannot provide it for him, therefore, it becomes the mandated responsibility of the signatories of the treaty to provide it for him. Your countries health care has become the health care system to the world paid for by the citizens of that ‘nation”

Canada is committed to ditching a policy that rejects immigrants because they’re sick or disabled and could be a drag on the health system, Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen says in November 2017:

“From a principled perspective, the current excessive demand provision policy simply does not align with our country’s values of inclusion of person with disabilities in Canadian society,” he said during an appearance at the House of Commons immigration committee Wednesday.

Hussen didn’t say how the provision would be changed, but said repealing it entirely is one option on the table. CBC full article.

“Palestine is the starting point for conquering the world”

“Palestine is the starting point for conquering the world”

Palestinian Islamic scholar Mohammad Afeef Shadid May 11 2022 sermon. Muslims conquer Palestine Europe

We were expelled from Palestine, 8 decades ago, and we will return to it, to every inch of it – not only to the homes which we left, carrying the house keys and nothing else. This is a reduction of our right. As the nation of Muhammad we have the right to Palestine in its entirety – every grain of its soil, every drop of its water, every whiff of its air. But that is not all. Palestine should be a center, a capital, and a starting point for conquering the world. Our sympathizers in the world, as well as our enemies should know, that the cause of our right of return does not pertain only to Palestine. The whole world is our battlefield. Our goal is not to liberate Palestine alone, but to liberate this sick world and deliver it from darkness to light (of Islam).

Muslims will Break the Cross Smash the Church and Establish a World Caliphate

Early Muslim Conquest

There are many academics and interfaith clergy that are promoting the idea that if the Israel “problem” were to be solved then that would bring an end to Muslim jihadist violence in the West. However that is not in keeping with the lectures of numerous Muslim leaders in the West. Many of these leaders are leading voices of Muslim organizations that promote Islamic supremacy and the establishment of an Islamic state that will rule over Muslims and non-Muslims.

The following links provide contextualization that will dispel misunderstanding of the Muslim leaders concerning interfaith dialogue. The following links explain how Islam will dominate Europe and North America and Canada.

Muslims conquer Palestine Europe