Brothers and sisters the last year a racist anti-Muslimism group have been desecrating and burning the Quran in front of the mosque in Norway. They are doing this to provoke a reaction from the Muslim community. So, that they can label Muslims as a violent terrorists and win support for their anti-Muslimism propaganda. The Norwegian government allows them to continue burning the Quran in front of the house of Allah in the name of freedom of speech.
Even during Ramadan they visited Muslim mosques and burned the Quran with the protection of the Norwegian police. For such a long time we Muslims have been feeling powerless because we can’t do anything when our religion our honor and the book that we hold so close to our heart are being humiliated and disgraced.
But things will now change, God willing, we have found a way to stop the desecration of the Quran. The extremist organization that is burning the Quran is called “Stop the Islamization of Norway”. They have come to our Masjid twice and hung two banners. One stating Islam is barbarism and unwanted in Norway the other banner labeling our Masjid “Oslo Jihad Center” insinuating Muslims are terrorists.
They are burning the Quran and hanging up these banners as a symbol of eradicating Islam in Norway. They are hoping to provoke a reaction from the Muslims so they can justify their hatred and win support for their anti-Muslim propaganda.
We will give them a reaction but not the one that they want to see. We will not do anything that would tarnish the image of Islam and create problems for the Muslims. Rather, every time they burn the Quran symbolizing the extinction of Islam we will react by raising huge amounts of funds to spread Islam and establish the symbols of Islam in Norway.
We have, praise be to Allah, purchased the largest mosque property in the capital of Norway to establish the biggest mosque and dawa’h center in this country. The despicable individual burning the Quran thinks that he can extinguish the light of Allah with his attacks. But we will use him, a useful idiot, to fund the spreading of the message of the Quran in Norway. Every time they burn the Quran we will raise tens of thousands of dollars and we will distribute 100 copies of the Quran to the people of Norway.
Praise be to Allah they want to extinguish the light of the Allah with their mouth but Allah refuses and uses them to perfect his light even though disbelievers hate it. Islam will be established in Norway. We will make these anti-Muslims the very reason for Islam to flourish in the country. So brothers and sisters please donate to generously in the path of Allah, defending the honor our religion and earning Allah’s pleasure and marvelous reward.
Famous Swedish fashion designer Johan Lindeberg has asserted that Sweden must embrace its new multicultural identity otherwise “civil war” is the alternative. The Alt-Right and Islamophobes argue that Western civilizations must fight now before it is to late. Muslims asserting cultural superiority
Justin Trudeau said: “Canada has no core identity or history” “the first post-national state” “pan-cultural heritage”. Therefore it will embrace any demands made by the Muslim community. This strategy ensures continued peace and multicultural harmony.
Johan Lindeberg of Sweden is calling on readers to “embrace the New Sweden,” Lindeberg urged Swedes to celebrate “the most progressive country in the world,” warning that chaos and disorder would ensue otherwise.
If Europe will adopt Islamic values it will avoid civil war.
“Either we all help to create a new inclusive energy and become a clear international template for a new multicultural community. Or we end up in a civil war. It has already started,” Lindeberg wrote.
The fashion designer even suggested changing the country’s flag to represent its new diverse identity and to “make Sweden relevant again.”
Asserting that a multicultural country was more sophisticated than a monocultural one, Lindeberg suggested that those uncomfortable with it will just have to get used to it.
“The change started a long time ago. But still, so many of us have a hard time accepting it,” he wrote.
Europeans must accept that the old Western values are dead
Like the rest of Europe, Sweden has also suffered an alarming rise in gang rapes and sexual molestations since throwing its borders open to mass immigration from the Middle East and North Africa.
When veteran Swedish police investigator Peter Springare was asked about the demographics of those responsible for violent crimes, he didn’t mince his words.
“Here we go; this is what I’ve handled from Monday-Friday this week: rape, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, rape-assault and rape, extortion, blackmail, assault, violence against police, threats to police, drug crime, drugs, crime, felony, attempted murder, rape again, extortion again and ill-treatment,” he wrote.
“Suspected perpetrators; Ali Mohammed, Mahmod, Mohammed, Mohammed Ali, again, again, again. Christopher… what, is it true? Yes, a Swedish name snuck in on the edges of a drug crime. Mohammed, Mahmod Ali, again and again,” he added.
Conclusion: Muslims asserting cultural superiority
If Europe will adopt Islamic values it will avoid civil war.
PREEMPTIVELY arresting Canadians: Trudeau’s ‘anti-hate’ bill will allow people to PREEMPTIVELY report Canadians for ‘hate speech’. Bill c36 discards principals of Western common law built over 30 centuries of custom, tradition and precedence. We can trace foundational elements of Canadian common law back toJustinian lawof 530 AD. Justinian law follows upon the laws of the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was then modified by the Anglo Saxons in the 6th century and the Normans in the 12th century. According to the practice of common law,aperson had the right to face his accuser and he could only be punished for a crime if found guilty of actually committing the crime. This no longer applies with Hate Speech Canada c36.
Those concepts are as they say “so yesterday”. This is a new Canada that is, as Justin Trudeau said, the “first post national state with no core identity or culture”. This new Canada has discarded its antiquated British Anglo Saxon culture and replaced it with a Global culture that eagerly and proudly promotes limiting speech to ensure community cohesion, harmony, respect for the sensibilities of the Muslim community and quashing any and all Islamophobic sentiments.
Muslim organizations such as NCCM have been lobbying Justin Trudeau and provincial leaders to expand hate speech laws to criminalize Islamophobia. Bill c36 gives the Muslim lobbyists more than they asked for. For the first time in the history of Western civilization, a person can be punished for the possibility that he might, at a future date, commit a crime that some, reasonable people, do not even consider a crime. Many elements of hate crimes conviction have been overturned on appeal or been upheld with a dissenting minority opinion.
An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act
Fear of hate propaganda offence or hate crime – Hate Speech Canada c36
810.012 (1) A person may, with the Attorney General’s consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit…
(a) an offence under section 318 or subsection 319(1) or (2);
(b) an offence under subsection 430(4.1); or
(c) an offence motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or any other similar factor.
Actus Reus is Commission of a Crime Mens Rea Determines Level of Guilt
Ottawa Muslim Immigrant Found Not Guilty of Rape due to No Mens Rea
In a written ruling, Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith said the Crown failed to prove that the accused had formed the required criminal intent — mens rea — to sexually assault his wife in 2002.
“I find that the accused probably had sex with his wife on many occasions without her specific consent, as both he and she believed that he had the right to do so,” Smith said. LINKLINKLINK
However, the judge ruled the man was not guilty of sexual assault because the Crown had failed to establish that he knew his behaviour was, in fact, criminal.
Inconsistencies in Defining Intentions – Hate Speech Canada c36
a: what one intends to do or bring about 1) b: the object for which a prayer, mass, or pious act is offered 2) a: determination to act in a certain way : RESOLVE 3 intentions plural: purpose with respect to marriage
It is a widely (was a) known fact that for a criminal offense to be established,actus reus and mens rea ought to be established. Actus reus is easy to establish because it is as simple as evaluating whether the physical criminal act was evident or not. However, mens readetermines the mental aspect of crimes, and it may not be easily determined by a court of law. In as much as the distinction between the physical and mental aspects of crime is the most common difference between actus reus and mens rea, the most important question is what is intention? And how is it defined? These questions compound the dilemma associated with defining mens rea.
Actus reus and mens rea must both be determined to be present before a defendant is prosecuted according to theprinciple of fair justice. This study, however, notes that it is much more difficult to establish mens rea since actus reus is a physical activity and can easily be established by the apparent facts. This study shows that mens rea is difficult to establish because there is no common ground for determining intention.
(8) The Commission may deal with a complaint in relation to a discriminatory practice described in section 13 without disclosing to the person against whom the complaint was filed or to any other person, the identity of the alleged victim, the individual or group of individuals who has filed the complaint or any individual who has given evidence or assisted the Commission in any way in dealing with the complaint, if the Commission considers that there is a real and substantial risk that any of those individuals will be subjected to threats, intimidation or discrimination.
A commission is a body that can be made up of people with little or no law training. People working in these commissions are appointedby the government. The government is likely to appoint those that are in line with the government’s ideological view point. It should be noted that Human Rights Commissions have a 90% conviction rate.
(9) In this section, hate speech means the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Detestation and vilification are subjective terms, which are defined by the reasonable man test. This test is no longer a metric to be relied on because today average Canadians can hold wildly divergent views on what is reasonable. Five decades ago, 95% of Canadians shared a culture, a tradition and an understanding of what constitutes “reasonable”. In Toronto 2022, you are more likely to bump into a Pakistani, Somali or Nigerian before an English-speaking Euro-Canadian. Canadian courts and commissions are increasingly taking on the meaning of reasonable from the perspective of non-Euro Canadians.
For greater certainty clarity — section 13 complaint
(1.1) For greater certainty, the Commission shall, under paragraph (1)(d), decline to deal with a complaint filed on the basis of section 13 if it is plain and obvious to the Commission that the complaint indicates no hate speech, as defined in subsection 13(9).
If we examine the implications of article (1.1), we can conclude that individuals will be prosecuted with the full force and resource of the state on the flimsiest of grounds. Since there is no liability for the person making the complaint, it is more than probable that it will at times be misused to settle grievances. The fact that there is financial compensation for victims of hate speech further incentivizes individuals to register complaints. We keep in mind that a commission is a bureaucracy. Bureaucracies tend to grow and amass power to suit the interests of the bureaucrats running the bureaucracy. This inevitably bolsters the deep state that operates at cross purposes to the benefit of society.
(3) If the provincial court judge before whom the parties appear is satisfied by the evidence adduced that the informant has reasonable grounds for the fear, the judge may order that the defendant enter into a recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for a period of not more than 12 months.
Hate speech laws are a drastic departure from Canadian – British legal tradition. Hate speech laws did not grow organically within a legal culture of precedent, one law leading to the next, then over centuries evolving into a legally stated and defined concept. In contrast, hate speech laws were created by an elite group of lawmakers, bureaucrats and academics. This law, 3.19 came about as a knee jerk response to a particular incidentand was then foisted onto the Canadian public and shoehorned into the Canadian legal system.
Today in Canada there are more than a few Canadian legal minds that believe hate speech legislation is a mistake. “It throws the baby out with the bathwater.” The baby in the water is Free Speech. Now with Bill c36, Hate Speech does not even need be uttered in order for a citizen to be treated as a criminal.
Conditions in recognizance
(6) The provincial court judge may add any reasonable conditions to the recognizance that the judge considers desirable to secure the good conduct of the defendant, including conditions that
(a) require the defendant to wear an electronic monitoring device, if the Attorney General makes that request;
(b) require the defendant to return to and remain at their place of residence at specified times;
(c) require the defendant to abstain from the consumption of drugs, except in accordance with a medical prescription, of alcohol or of any other intoxicating substance;
(d) require the defendant to provide, for the purpose of analysis, a sample of a bodily substance prescribed by regulation on the demand of a peace officer, a probation officer or someone designated under paragraph 810.3(2)(a) to make a demand, at the place and time and on the day specified by the person making the demand, if that person has reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant has breached a condition of the recognizance that requires them to abstain from the consumption of drugs, alcohol or any other intoxicating substance.
811 A person bound by a recognizance under section 83.3, 810, 810.01, 810.1 or 810.2 who commits a breach of the recognizance is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction
(4) However, if the provincial court judge is also satisfied that the defendant was convicted previously of any offence referred to in subsection (1), the judge may order that the defendant enter into the recognizance for a period of not more than two years.
End of inserted block
Refusal to enter into recognizance
Start of inserted block
(5) The provincial court judge may commit the defendant to prison for a term of not more than 12 months if the defendant fails or refuses to enter into the recognizance.
The bill aims to:
amend the Canadian Human Rights Act to define a new discriminatory practice of communicating hate speech online, and to provide individuals with additional remedies to address hate speech;
add a definition of “hatred” to section 319 of the Criminal Code based on Supreme Court of Canada decisions; and
create a new peace bond in the Criminal Code designed to prevent hate propaganda offences and hate crimes from being committed, and make related amendments to the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Is Bill c36 Canada’s Version of Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law?
Pakistan’s blasphemy lawhave long been a point of criticism against successive Pakistani governments. The October 2018 acquittal of Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman imprisoned for nearly a decade on blasphemy charges, and her subsequent immigration to Canada in May 2019 renewed a spotlight on this pressing issue. Although the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) welcomed the decision by the Pakistani Supreme Court to overturn Asia Bibi’s death sentence and was relieved she was able to safely depart Pakistan for Canada.
Declared an Islamic Republic in 1956, Pakistan has institutionalized the relationship between the state and the Islamic faith and accordingly sought to protect the beliefs and practices of its majority religion against any actions “intended to outrage religious feelings.” Under sections 295 and 298 of Pakistan’s Penal Code, individuals are prohibited from verbal and nonverbalactions deemed insulting to religious belief and practice. These provisions extend to protect physical documents such as copies of the Qur’an and other religious texts, places of worship, the reputation of the Prophet Muhammad, and other religious symbols.
The burden of proof required in these cases is minimal. Unsubstantiated, wildly implausible, or outright false accusations stemming from personal or domestic disputes are fairly common, especially against religious minorities. This fact was recognized by the Supreme Court in its decision to acquit Asia Bibi. As noted in USCIRF’s December 2018 report, Limitations on Minorities’ Religious Freedom in South Asia, blasphemy laws have also been used in Pakistan to limit and criminalize religious conversions and proselytization translating and uploading content to personal blogs and non-Muslim websites or writing Facebook posts deemed to be insulting to the Islamic faith; and making comments in personal conversations that witnesses attest to be blasphemous in nature.
Justin Trudeau’s Statement After the Beheading of French Teacher Samuel Depaty:
Everybody must be aware of our words and actions on others…. We will always defend freedom of expression. But everyone must act respectfully towards others and not try to needlessly or arbitrarily hurt someone we share this planet and this society with…. In a society such as ours we should strive to be respectful and not to insult anyone. It’s a matter of respect. it’s a matter of not trying to dehumanize or deliberately hurt someone. I think this is an extremely important debate to have with regards to having possible exceptions. But often the intention is less important because the action is still hurtful. So our society is based on respecting others and listening and learning so we should have this discussion in a respectful manner.
London Family Act.
cpac Panel addresses Islamophobia in Canada Tragedy of London Ontario – June 9, 2021
Interviewer: Politicians are concerned about balancing free speech. What’s your message to them?
Nawaz Tahir My message to them at the vigil and my message to them today is the same. What is the point of having freedom of expression when a Canadian family does not have the freedom to walk on the sidewalk and walk on the sidewalk without being murdered.
Interviewer; Some politicians are saying yes we are prepared to go further but we do have to be careful, to make sure that we have not shut down free speech. How do we achieve that balance?
Nawaz Tahir In Canada’s Constitution freedom of expression is not absolute. Through legislation, through civil law remedy, our constitution itself says that those freedoms are reasonably limited in a free Democratic society.
Multiculturalism and diversity cannot do other than dilute Canadian culture. The culture that was Canada will change as immigrants add their values to the Canadian Mosaic. The question not many ask and even less try to answer is, when is Canada diverse enough? Is the plan to forever enrich Canada with a stream of immigrants whose culture and values are specifically non-Western, non-European, non-Enlightenment, non-Liberal, non Feminism, pro Tribalism and pro-Ethnocentric, anti-Free Speech, hyper sectarian, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, until Canada resembles Pakistan. The way immigration is progressing soon all Toronto will resemble Mogadishu the Capital of Somalia. In Pakistan blasphemy laws are used to advance agendas and punish rivals.
Muslim Vote Changing Canada. In the 2021 Canadian federal election, there are 107 ridings across Canada in which the total number of potential Muslim voters exceeds the predicted margin of victory. Canadian Muslims are in a unique position in this and future elections to decide which party will govern Canada. Muslim Vote Canada
In the past Muslims were told by their religious and community leaders that voting was in contradiction of sharia principals. Sharia dictates that democracy, ruling by man-made law, is a major sin. Allah MHNBE is the only possible legislator.
However, after much debate and consideration the major world Muslim organizations applied the concept of musleha. Permitting sin for the greater good. Sheikh Yasir Qadhi uploaded alecturein 2012 the following is an excerpt.
So they started giving fatwa. One of the most famous amongst them said I used to say that democracy is haram now I say participation in democracy is our jihad. Jihad here means obviously the struggle. We’re going to go and struggle through democracy. We’re going to fight not through the bullets but the ballots. He literally said that phrase in Arabic. ‘This is our jihad, going to the polls and making sure that we win.“
Sheikh Yasir Qadhi 2012
WHO WE ARE
The Canadian-Muslim Vote is a national, non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots organization that aims to increase civic engagement of Canadian Muslims through community outreach and education.
The Electoral Power of Canadian Muslims to Dramatically Alter Canada to Reflect Muslim Values is Increasing Exponentially
Canadian Muslims wield a great deal of electoral power — if we get out and vote. Our latest projections have shown that in the 2021 federal election, the total amount of potential Muslim voters will outnumber the predicted margin of victory in 107 ridings, representing almost 1/3rd of all ridings in Canada. This means that Canadian Muslims are in the unique position to decide who will govern and whether they form a majority or minority government. Politicians of all stripes and levels of government have taken notice of this trend.
*Based on Statistics Canada custom tabulation and projection, 2019 Elections Canada voter turnout data, and 338canada.com projections.
The Fight Against Islamophobia
This election also comes at a time when the fight against Islamophobia – on the heels of heinous incidents like the Quebec City Mosque shooting and the June London terror attack – is more a part of the national discourse than ever before. Last April, an important report titled Layered Suspicion released in collaboration by University of Toronto’s Institute of Islamic Studies and the National Council of Canadian Muslims made headlines across the country for its critical analysis of Islamophobia in the audit process of the Canada Revenue Agency. Shortly after, in July, political leaders across the country from all parties and levels of government attended the first ever National Summit on Islamophobia, where they denounced Islamophobia and pledged to take various degrees of action to combat Islamophobia, including reforming the CRA’s charity audit process and providing funding for Muslim community projects. Although these are positive first steps, Canadian Muslims must make their voices heard in this election to ensure that combatting Islamophobia remains at the forefront of the national discourse and that more concrete steps are taken going forward.
GOOD FRIDAY JUMU’AH
The Canadian-Muslim Vote was officially launched on April 3rd, 2015 through our first outreach initiative. We worked with 23 masjids across the Greater Toronto Area to deliver a coordinated khutba (public sermon) on the importance of civic engagement for the Canadian Muslim community. The Canadian-Muslim Vote was present at all participating masjids and reached out to over 15,000 people.
The Canadian Muslim Vote is proud to announce that our campaign for the 2021 federal election is in full swing! Our team is hard at work encouraging Canadian Muslims in each province and territory to get out and vote. In the run-up to election day on September 20, 2021, TCMV will be busy tracking Canadian Muslim voter trends, hosting virtual and in-person events all over Canada, and sharing engaging and informative content across our website, and Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram pages.
What is Good Friday Jummah (GFJ)?: Friday is the busiest day at Mosques across the globe. With our Good Friday Jummah, we take the opportunity present to drive an election readiness campaign including critical voter information aimed at encouraging Muslims to vote.
What actually happens on Good Friday Jummah (GFJ)?: The highlight of the GFJ is the coordinated Friday sermon in mosques across the country. GFJ kicks off an election readiness campaign which includes our flagship Eid Dinner where over 60 elected officials and party leaders join us for a meal celebrating the end of the holy month of Ramadan. This event helps combat the myths and misconceptions many politicians might have about the Muslim community.
2015 FEDERAL ELECTION
In this Federal Election, Canadian Muslims came out to vote in in record numbers. An estimated 79% of Canadian Muslims voted in the 2015 Federal Election according to a recent post-election poll conducted by Mainstreet Research. The poll surveyed Muslims from municipalities across Canada to determine Canadian Muslim voter turnout. In the ridings that The Canadian-Muslim Vote targeted, the voter turnout amongst Canadian Muslims was a groundbreaking 88%.
How to Use Islamophobia to Advance the Cause of Allah in Canada
Professionally designed Workshops by Council of Canadian Muslim (NCCM), will come to your school, hospital, factory, private firm or government institution. Workshops can be tailored to effectively address the misperception of children from kindergarten up to K12. We offer a range of specially designed intensive training programs to meet the needs of any work force, office setting or government institution….
…participating in major public conferences, coalitions, and campaigns with community partners on pressing issues such as reasonable accommodation of religious practices, national security, fundamental rights, countering extremism and much more.
Imam Abdullah Hakim Quick Encourages Muslims to Vote. This is to Prevent Evil and Enjoin Good
The issue of calling to the good and forbidding evil is one of the central ideas in Islamic lifestyle. Muslims have a duty to call to the good and forbid evil based on the tradition of the prophet Muhammad PBUH. Whoever sees evil change it with your hands, with your tongue, or with your heart. But that is the lowest form of faith. Here in the Western countries and in many parts of the world in the 21st century this idea of standing for good and forbidding evil takes the form of voting especially in so-called democratic societies. Therefore, in Canada and United States and in Europe in places where Muslims find themselves as a minority it is not enough to just pray and stay to yourself and your Masjid or Muslim center. We need to be heard in society and we need to support that political party and those individuals who will benefit our society, benefit Muslims, and will be a source of unity and strength for the society. It is a duty of Muslims to stand up. It is no longer enough to be quiet so take your vote base it on morality. Base it on goodness but don’t stay silent because your silence will be consent to evil in our society. Go to Canadian muslimvote.ca to register immediately.
Muslim occupy strategic location and political positions all over the world including Canada. Inshallah (praise be to Allah)
Imam Abdullah Hakim Quick is a former president of the Canadian Council of Imams
What is our situation as a community? We also find ourselves in a very critical time. We have huge numbers. We are over 26% of the Earth’s population. We have young people. 60% of Muslims are young people. We have strategic positions all over the world. We have some of the richest people on earth. May Allah protect the children of the world. May Allah protect the innocent women of the Muslim community. May Allah protect, unite and strengthen the men of the Muslim community.
At just 4% the Muslim community is pushing forward their agenda at a incredible pace. Consider that 40 years ago there was no Muslim lobby or Muslim political influence in Canada. The forward momentum is moving not in a linear but exponential manner. At current rates it seems certain that in 40 years the Muslim population will grow to be at least 10% of the Canadian population.
Promote Truth & Cancel Falsehood. Is Peter Julian the one who can be trusted to never make a mistake?
In Canada at the moment there are many topics that are subjected to a variety of viewsand opinions. It seem, according to NDP MP Peter Julian, that this type of diversity is not to be accepted or tolerated.
Some believe only God or a God can Promote Truth & Cancel Falsehood.
Justin Trudeau says the Canadian government follows sciencebecause it is the truth. Religion is a belief system that is not science. Therefore, according to Peter Julian, all religion is disinformation.
Peter Julian has determined there is one truth and all others are mis- or disinformation. Once the Ministry of Truth has identified the true religion, all others will be classified as false.
Diet. Which one should Canadians be permitted to advocate or speak of? Should it be carnivore, vegan, vegetarian or herbivore? Once the Ministry has determined what is true and best, all others will be placed on the misinformation list.
Movies are structured with a narrative that conveys a meaning or many meanings. Verifying & Accrediting the Truth of movie narratives is the responsibility of the Ministry. Itwill have a department dedicated to purging past and present movies with narratives, deemed false, harmful or undesirable.
Horoscopes are deemed to be unscientific and a source of misinformation. They will be placed on the misinformation list and purged from society.
Citizen cohesive inter funding community developmental project
COVID 19 has placed a strain on Canadian finances. It is proposed all smart phones, tablets and laptops will be subject to an additional 3% tax to help the government offset the funding for the Ministry of Truth headed by NDP MP Peter Julian.
NDP MP Peter Julian call for censorship is very much in harmony with that of the Islamic leaders of Canada, America and Europe. They are calling for introduction of legislation to punish individuals or organization that promote misinformation. This legislation will also punish those that insult and ridicule Islam, Muslims or Prophet Mohammad PBUH. This will promote peace, social harmony.
Some Canadians are being radicalized thru social media, thru fox news & getting a very distorted picture of reality. This is threatening to those who’ve been & continue to be targets of violence & oppression. We gotta make sure Canadians are getting facts not propaganda #cdnpoli
Canadian government will Promote truth cancel falsehood
Texas Imam, Yale PhD scholar Yasir Qadhi: What is the Ruling on Blasphmy? Lecture premiered Nov 3, 2020. The beading of French teacher Samuel Paty happened days prior to this lecture. Below in an excerpt
“The fourth question Muslim minorities, us, in America, in England, in France, in Canada, in Australia, in Germany and across the European and Western worlds. We are living in secular democracies. We are living as a minority and we all understand that the laws of the land are based on sources that are not our sources. So what is the responsibility of Muslims living in Western lands vis-a-vis the laws found in the classical books and the rulings pertaining to any type of judgment that is of a penal nature ie: criminal law that are found in the Shari’a?” Complete video
Muslim scholars teach that implementing Islamic Law is a moral duty of Believing Muslim. Bilal Philips in Australia.
In 2017 the European Court heard a case where sharia law was applied to a disagreement between citizens of Greece who are Muslims.
Christian Concern (CC), a non-profit organization based in London, intervened in the case, “because of the importance of the case in European law and its implications for countries across Europe, including the UK,” according to a press statement by CC.
According to Dieppe, an estimated 85 sharia courts operate in the UK. “The use of Sharia has led to the promotion of parallel societies within the United Kingdom,”
Throughout Europe there are Shari’a law tribunals. Some experts will say “While there are undoubtedly lots of different councils and tribunals dealing with Shari’a principles, they aren’t courts of law. Most are Shari’a ‘councils’ set up to make decisions on purely religious matters, although there are some bodies that mix Shari’a principles with legally binding arbitration. But none can overrule the regular courts. However civilly undocumented marriages are performed when a second wife is taken.
The following are excerpt from Islam Q&A academic, educational and da‘wah website supervised by Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid, dealing with the topic of Muslims dealing with non-Islamic laws.
The statement that whoever does not judge according to what Allaah revealed is a kaafir, a zaalim (oppressor or wrongdoer) and a faasiq (sinner), as Allaah says: “. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon.” [aayah 44]; “. . . And whoever does not judge by that which Allaah has revealed, such are the zaalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers)” [aayah 45]; “. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed (then) such (people) are the faasiqoon (rebellious or disobedient).” [aayah 47].
Referring for judgment to courts of man-made law which is contrary to sharee’ah is not permissible; the same applies to working in them and applying those laws among people.
The scholars of the Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas were asked: What is the ruling on referring for judgment to American law in a dispute between Muslims, with regard to cases of divorce, commerce and other matters?
They replied: It is not permissible for a Muslim to refer for judgment to man-made laws.